Sunday, May 29, 2016

“UNDERSTANDING OUR HUMAN SEXUALITY”

“UNDERSTANDING OUR HUMAN SEXUALITY”
A Biblico-Theological Reflection
REV. JERIC C. CORTADO
++++++++++++++++++++++++
This paper deals with the meaning and the challenges on human sexuality to our family, church and our society; and the biblical and theological foundations of human sexuality.
+++++++++++++++++++++

DEFINING OUR HUMAN SEXUALITY
According to Prof. Traci West[1], Human Sexuality is a gift of God. This is part of the created gift which God saw as being “very good” and that would enjoy through our sensory perceptions (taste, touch, smell, sight, and hearing); our physicality (which involves the shape of our body, texture, hairiness, stamina, mobility, flexibility); our emotions (wants, needs, fears, shame, joys, wonder); our minds (wherein we have the ability to imagine, fantasize, delay and interrupt our sensory responses); our affection (which involves sensual presence impacts with others); and most of all, human sexuality as a gift of God would be enjoy through our spirituality. It is a way of being which involves our relationship with self, others, nature, history, and God as we live in a particular context.

In other words, human sexuality encompasses our personality which includes our gender identity, attraction, expression, and sex. Gender identity is all about how we think about ourselves. It is about how we internally understand the chemistry that composes us as individual person. Gender Identity is an individual’s personal identification of being male or female, or transgender, or other. Gender identity is the internal sense of being male, female, or something in between. Since gender identity is internal, one’s gender identity is not necessarily visible to others. The formation of identity is affected by hormones and environment just as much as it is by biological sex. Oftentimes, problems arise when someone is assigned a gender based on their sex at birth that doesn’t align with how they come to identify.

In our patriarchal society, human sexuality which encompasses our personality is also formed by the way we expressed our life in the society which is known to us as gender expression or gender role. The way people act and say to express being a girl or a boy, a woman or a man. These characteristics are shaped by society. Every culture has gender roles — they all have expectations for the way women and men, girls and boys, should dress, behave, and look. This expectation of the society is called gender stereotyping. The expectation of society about how we should think and act as girls and boys, women and men defined based on our biological sex.  Stereotyping which also known as sexism has four kinds as follows:
1.       Personality traits — For example, women are often expected to be passive and submissive, while men are usually expected to be self-confident and aggressive.
2.       Domestic behaviors — For example, caring for children is often considered best done by women, while household repairs are often considered best done by men.
3.       Occupations — For example, until very recently most nurses and secretaries were usually women, and most doctors and construction workers were usually men.
4.       Physical appearance — For example, women are expected to be small and graceful, while men are expected to be tall and broad-shouldered.

Biological sex refers to the objectively measurable organs, hormones and chromosomes. You are called female because you have vagina and ovaries, and with XX chromosomes. You are a male because of your penis, testes, and XY chromosomes. But you are called intersex if you have both. In the illustration the term “asex” means without sex, while the female-ness and male-ness is on what you possess under your hood.

Gender attraction is about to whom you are attracted or to whom you fall in love with, which is also called sexual orientation.  According to the American Psychological Association (APA) is "distinguished by an enduring emotional, romantic, sexual or affectionate attraction to individuals of a particular gender." The three commonly recognized aspects of sexual orientation are heterosexuality (sexual attraction to people of the opposite gender), bisexuality (sexual attraction to people of both the male and female gender), and homosexuality (sexual attraction to members of the same gender).[2]

Human Sexuality touches all aspect of our human life and being including our identity or thoughts, desires, feelings, emotions, activities, relationships and behaviors associated with a certain gender. Human Sexuality is the fundamental component of human personality. The way we live as human being is what called spirituality, which affirms that the Spirit of God present in all human activities, personal and social, as a liberating force manifested concretely within the historical context of community; and a way of being which involves one's relationship with self (how we understand ourselves), others, nature, history, and God. Spirituality emphasizes of what we do and how we live the demands and tasks of our faith as we live it out in a certain context.

We recognize that sexuality is God's good gift to all persons which is very clear in the creation story. In the Hebrew Scriptures there are two creation accounts that highlight human sexuality which expressed in the relationship of man and women, the male and female in the course of creation movement. In Genesis 1 (vv. 26-28) which is believed to have been written by Priestly source[3] (P) between 550-450 B.C.E., the creation of humankind comes as climax of all the other creative works.
26.  Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth." 
 27.  So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them
 28.  And God blessed them, and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth."  (RSV)

The accounts points out the equality and equal dignity of the two sexes (Male and Female) and God blessed this by saying to both, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth." God blessed their relationship to be the image of God. A human image created in the image and likeness of God as male and female. Here, to be a man means to be a male and female, to be a male or female, and to be a male or female, or male and female means to be in the image of God. Paul K. Jewett noted that it says “created them” not “him” or “her”. Thus male (ish) is not called man until he is united with the female (ishah) which complete his humanity in the same breath with the female.

In Genesis 2 which is believed to be written in between 960 to 930 B.C.E by the Yahwist source[4] (J) highlights the unitive aspect of marriage.

 18.  Then the Lord God said, "It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him." 
 19.  So out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the air, and brought them to the man to see what he would call them; and whatever the man called every living creature, that was its name. 
 20.  The man gave names to all cattle, and to the birds of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for the man there was not found a helper fit for him. 
 21.  So the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and while he slept took one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh; 
 22.  and the rib which the Lord God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man. 
 23.  Then the man said, "This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man." 
 24.  Therefore a man leaves his father and his mother and cleaves to his wife, and they become one flesh. 
 25.  And the man and his wife were both naked, and were not ashamed.  (RSV)

The Lord God caused Adam a deep sleep (Genesis 2:21) and during that moment or after the deep sleep something extra ordinary happen which is on Hebrew term called “tardemah” which means “ecstacy”. Ecstasy is literally means “to be outside oneself.” What is it that comes “outside” of the man is the woman who came out through the rib from the man, which according to St. John Paul II, it  affirms the indispensable equality of the sexes and place it on a sure foundation. Meaning, man and woman are of the same nature and genus. They are of the same specie which shares the same humanity and dignity.

The second account of creation describes how Adam and Eve experienced each other as human beings. It acknowledges the special closeness of man and woman. The Hebrew word Adam is used as term for human being which God created in his own image or in God’s likeness Adam (Human Being) is created.  In his image (Adam), God created male (Zakar = Masculine) and female (unequebah = feminine) which expresses the collective concept of human being. This simply manifests that God created male and female possessing each individual intellect and freewill enjoying their own sexuality being called to a life of communion and complementarity. When God said, "It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him."  It indicates that woman comes from the very same life as man. Meaning the woman is a person or a human being the same with man possessing the same mark of solitude.  Their dignity should understand in terms of their humanity and personality. Consider their own sexuality which is a fundamental and natural part of being human, for people of all ages.

It is evident from the scripture that both the male and female share alike the distinctiveness of a man, and they are both participates in the image of God. According to Paul K. Jewett, the fellowship as male and female is what it means to be in the image of God. According to Dr. Noriel C. Capulong[5], to be in the image of God who cares the poor, oppressed, marginalized, exploited, and deprived Hebrew or Lumad people then and today is to be actively involved in the liberation of oneself and fellow human being, recognizing our identity and dignity living in a just society and enjoying the gift of God’s creation, and living in a responsible social and sexual relationships.

THE THEOLOGY OF HUMAN SEXUALITY
In a simple definition, theology means the study of God (theos). The way we think about God, how we talk about God, what we believe about God based on our context and our experiences as we articulate our assumptions or reflections make up our theology. During the first century, theology was a meditation on the Bible geared towards spiritual growth. During the 12th century, Aristotle spoke about theology as “subordinate science” which is in our current terms is a branch of Philosophy. A science which ambiguous and does not satisfy human mind. Thomas Aquinas expressed about theology as a fusion of faith and reason, a meeting of spiritual and rational knowledge. In so theology communicate about the spiritual and rational knowledge. And recently another function of theology developed which being articulated as critical reflection on the church’s presence and activity in the world. In this outlook, Christian faith is understood as a commitment, as attitude, as principles towards life in the light of revelation.  Theology in this sense is a reflection of what the Church is doing (Church praxis) or what the Christians are doing in the light of the signs of the times.

This new perspective defines theology contextually as a way of understanding the Christian faith not only on the basis of Scripture and tradition (the two main theological sources of reflection of classical/traditional theology) but also on the basis of concrete human experience. In the light of the Latin American Liberation Theology, this new understanding provided a vision for the future which empowers the people to change the existing values and relationship. It is integral to people’s ongoing struggle for their identity and justice. This defines theology as critical reflection of Church’s praxis manifesting the preferential option for the poor.  The phrase "option for the poor" is first used by Fr. Pedro Arrupe, Superior General of the Society of Jesus (Jesuits) in the 1968 letter to the Jesuits of Latin America. The term “poor” then basically emphasized the economically poor. In 1970’s the term “poor” was extended to the “culturally poor” including the indigenous people, blacks, and other discriminated cultural minorities. And in 1980’s the term “poor” was given the emphasis on the question of gender, and feminist theology emerged. As established theological principle, the option for the poor was first articulated by Fr. Gustavo Gutierrez, O.P. in his landmark work, A Theology of Liberation (1971). 

And this theological principle, “option for the poor” was used by Marcella Reid in her theology of human sexuality which is also known as indecent theology, an option for the right to come out from the closet of human sexuality. This coming out from the closet even in the world of Latin American Liberation Theology is perceived indecent or out from the normal course of doing theology.

The term “indecent” suspiciously influenced by the Argentinian term “Decencia/Indecencia” (Decency/Indecency). For Latin American men, decency refers to honesty and trustworthiness. But for women, it deals with the set of normal behavior expected to women according to her age and social economic status. It is a web of expectation based on sexual understanding including the dress codes, mobility and hairstyle. Even though the decency expected for women in Latin America is a manifestation of pervasive marginalization of human sexuality. Decency refers to the socially accepted norms, lifestyle, and even sexuality; and outside from this normality is called indecency.

Our perspective, manners, and reflections on life is always biased on our human sexuality either it is socially expected and inculcated or personally preferred. This is how Marcella Althaus-Reid perceived the limits of the norms of Liberation Theology - called suspicious (guarded) ideology in theology. Knowing that the political, economic, socio-cultural, racial, and sexual issues have co-existed in the web of oppression in Latin America, even in other cultures and in all times. We are all subjects of manners of life as presented to us and inculcated to us by the patriarchal dominant cultures. Outside from this mode is considered indecent or not proper that must be put in the margins.

Going back to the notion of the “poor”, basically defines to the economic, political, and socio-cultural barometer and without considering human sexuality. Indecent Theology suggested that the “poor” are also those people experiencing inadequate access to education, health care, public services, living wages, and discrimination because of culture, race, gender and sexual orientation. Those who are deprived for having the access of basic social services and victims of bullying because of their sexuality and sexual orientation are considered also poor. Those who are suppressed of their true feelings because of the social expectation for his/her sex are considered poor.

Indecent theology is a theology of human sexuality that affirms the liberating teachings and ministry of Jesus demonstrating radical presence to those rejected and marginalized because of their human sexuality. 

The phenomenal realities in human sexuality called us to discernment and renew our commitment as faithful witnesses to the gospel. Dedicate ourselves for others, passionately living out the ministry of Christic hospitality and compassion to all people regardless of their sexuality and sexual orientation. Welcome them into our churches demonstrating faith in our loving God. We should be willing to listen and open our hearts to their stories and struggles in our churches, and in our society in general. Initiate and encourage a collective study and dialogue around issues of human sexuality in our churches and particular community. # 

References
1.        Capulong, Noriel C. 2011. “Human Rights: A Theological and Historical Basis” in Human Rights a Resource Material for Church Worker. Philippines: Regional Ecumenical Council in the Cordillera. 
2.        Ignacio, Simon Peter G. (ed.). (1981). Human Sexuality and Personhood. USA: Franciscan Herald Press.
3.        Maningas, Ismael Ireneo. (1998). Filipino Christian Morality. Philippines: St. Pauls.
4.        Masters, William H., et al. (1992). Human Sexuality. USA: Harper Collins.
5.        Reid, Marcella L. 2005. “From Liberation Theology to Indecent Theology” in Latin American Liberation Theology: The Next Generation. Edited by Ivan Petrella. USA: Orbis Books.
7.        Resolution #2041, 2008 United Methodist Book of Resolutions. USA: The United Methodist Publishing House.
8.        (2008). Catechism for Filipino Catholics. Philippines: CBCP.
11.      http://catholicmoraltheology.com/the-church-and-the-transgender-community
13.      Sumerian History and Mesopotamian Culture. http://churchofcriticalthinking.org/sumer.html
14.      http://history-world.org/sumeria.htm
17.      Gutierrez, Gustavo. (1995) A Theology of Liberation. USA: Orbis Books.
18.      Migliore, Daniel L. (1991) Faith Seeking Understanding. USA: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
19.      http://ncronline.org/ Gustavo Gutierrez and the preferential option for the poor. John Dear, Nov. 8, 2011
20.      usccb.org/jphd/Catholic Social Teaching on Poverty, an Option for the Poor, and the Common Good.
21.      West, Traci. Sex and the Church Theology of Sexuality. Retrieved from http://umc-gbcs.org/faith-in-action/sex-and-the-church-theology-of-sexuality.
22.      Balley, Emely R. The Church and Transgender Community (2014, April 11). Retrieved from http://catholicmoraltheology.com/the-church-and-the-transgender-community
23.      Lecture notes of Rev. Fr. Orlando Angelia STD, IIREF.
24.      Pontifical Council for the Family,  The Truth  and  Meaning  of  Human  Sexuality:  Guidelines  for  Education  Within the  Family, December 8, 1995.





[1] West, Traci. Sex and the Church Theology of Sexuality. Retrieved from http://umc-gbcs.org/faith-in-action/sex-and-the-church-theology-of-sexuality.
[2] http://www.faqs.org/health/topics/70/Sexual-orientation.html
[3] A historical narrative concerned with the origin and regulations of institution of Israel. It focuses on genealogies, cultic laws, covenants, high days like the Sabbath, blueprints of cultic buildings, and procedures for sacrifices and ceremonies (Leviticus 1-7, 17-26). It emphasizes God’s holiness, sovereignty, and transcendence along with the establishment of the true worship of Yahweh led by the priest. It places Israel’s worship within the context of creation (Genesis 1).
[4] In the German Spelling Jahweh is the Yahwist narrative that runs from Genesis 2 through Numbers 22-24.  This source emphasizes God’s nearness and God is described in human terms. It underscores the continuity of God’s purpose from creation through the patriarchs to Israel’s role as his people.
[5] Capulong, Noriel C. 2011. “Human Rights: A Theological and Historical Basis” in Human Rights a Resource Material for Church Worker. Philippines: Regional Ecumenical Council in the Cordillera.  

No comments:

Post a Comment